Guardian Angel Changes Trajectory Of Car To Save Driver? - Ghost Theory

In the strange world we live in, there happens things that are hard to explain. The following video depicts just such an occurrence.

According to the commentary on the video, the young man in the car hit a horse (edited out) which sent him careening across the center median. Just as he crosses the median, a figure appears out of the dust and seemingly causes the car to change direction.

Is this a Guardian Angel or something else entirely? Lets look in on the incident and see:

So, there you have it! Is this some sort of saving grace or just our eyes playing tricks on us.

If you look where the car ends up, you can see that it just misses an obstacle that could possibly have thrown the driver through the windshield or worse. Did this “helper” redirect the young man enough for him to avoid the obstacle? Are we seeing a mere dust shadow of the horse-tender in another cars headlights? Is there even something there at all? Could this be just a hoax?

It’s all up to you the reader to decide.

Thanks to NYC812 for providing the Guardian Angel video.

Associated Content:

GT: Ghost Polaroids Interview: Your questions answered
GT: Is this the Fourth Horseman of the Apocalypse?
GT: Pareidolia or Long Dead Sailor’s Ghostly Face?

Video: Amazing UFO Seen Over Crete - Ghost Theory

I’ve seen a lot of UFO pictures in my time, but occasionally one comes along that for the life of me, I just can’t logically explain. Now I have to depend on our UFO ID expert Henry and I’m not so sure even Henry can come up with a feasible explanation on this one.

A German couple out photo-journaling the day last month got a big shock while going through shots they had taken along Balos Beach, Gramvousa in Crete.

There are obviously goats in the foreground, however, up in the sky, we can see an oddly shaped metallic object. My first inclination was a bird as it does have some shape aspects that tend to lean that way, but the reflection of the sun off the metal-like surface tells me something different. What that something may be, is where I get stuck.

According to Google Odd News, it went something like this:

The UFO was not the subject of the photographs Intended. The couple had targeted some goats to capture for posterity and only noticed the UFO When They looked back on Their photographs. The couple had not spotted the strange object in the sky, nor heard any strange noises.

Disclose TV Reported They said the couple first noticed the UFO When They scrolled through the shots on Their camera. The German woman recounted:

“We Could not believe what we saw, Such a strange shape. Immediately We started discussing possibilities to define what it could be, but had no idea. We did not notice anything was in the sky When I took the shot. We didn ‘ t experience anything strange. It was a warm, sunny day, but there was a strong wind out of the Northeast. There was no sound.”

Net Defence According To The photograph does not Appear to Have Been tampered with and Appears authentic. Read the rest here.

In my humble opinion, this sighting ranks right up there. Unless of course it is a bird or a big giant hoaxy fake. In that case, I wouldn’t be as impressed. By the by, I have no idea where “up there” is, so I wouldn’t depend on me for anything more than a sharp stick in the eye.

So, again I reach out to the idio…I mean, well informed readers here at GT. Time to put your thinking caps on, or for those among us who are paranoid, your tin foil hat.

Note: You can make a delightfully fresh and effective cleaner out of water, vinegar and a little lemon juice.

Thanks to Google User Content for keeping us up to date on the coming invasion. Oh and one honorable mention to Will Smith for punching that alien in the face.

Associated Content:

GT: Alien Beings secretly Filmed?
GT: Russian Navy UFO records:”Ocean UFOs often show up”
GT: Flying entities of Mexico – A closer look

Newton's Belief in Spirits May Have Led To The Theory of Gravity - Daily Grail

For those who would like to see irrationalism and magical thinking stamped out (*cough* Dawkins *cough*), here's a prime example of how silly black/white us vs them thinking is: Isaac Newton's theory of gravity may have arisen from his interest in the spirit world

[Newton'] belief in spirits and what the alchemists called active principles almost certainly allowed him to conceive gravity in the mathematical form that we still use today.

In Newton's time, the natural philosophers had turned their backs on astrology and with it, the idea that influences could simply leap across empty space. Instead impulses had to be transmitted through things touching one another. So, if there was a force coming from the Sun that moved the planets, then it had to do so through a medium.

Perhaps it was a fluid, driven to circulate by the rotation of the sun, which carried the planets around. This was the thinking of French philosopher René Descartes.

Yet Newton could not make the mechanical solution of Descartes work. The vortices simply could not reproduce the changes in speed of the planets as they approached the sun.

Alchemy offered a way out by having as a philosophical underpinning that non-material influences – spirits – existed. These needed no physical contact and could induce transformations or movement through the triggering of "active principles" within an object.

Primed to believe in these ideas, Newton discovered a simple, elegant mathematical equation that described the behaviour of gravity without the need for an intervening fluid. Gravity apparently worked across empty space. He called this principle "action at a distance" and instead of "spirit" began using the word "force" to better reflect its mathematical character.

His equation also reveals the "active principle" that governs an object's response to gravity. It is mass. With such direct analogies to spirits and active principles, Newton must surely have felt some sort of vindication for his alchemical beliefs.

The theory of gravity was so successful that it became one of the triggers for the Age of Enlightenment. Although hardly anyone now believes in the concept of alchemy, we do still believe that gravity can exert an influence across empty space. Engineers still use Newton's maths to launch satellites and send spacecraft to distant planets.

So was Sir Isaac a scientist or a sorcerer? In truth, he was a bit of both. And that was why he could succeed where others had failed.

I find it rather amusing that Richard Dawkins is a fan of the poetry of W.B. Yeats, considering the latter's inspiration in mysticism and occultism. Dawkins famously brushed that complication aside by saying "oh Yeats wrote a lot of pretty words; whether they mean anything is another matter." That's not as easily done when it comes to Newton I'd imagine...

BBC: Was Newton a Scientist or a Sorcerer?

Full Bodied Apparition Caught On Video - Ghost Theory

Strange. The Anomalist recently posted a link to an interesting YouTube video in which is said to show a “full bodied apparition”.

My paranormal team investigated a 120 year old building (now a deli) and while investigating in the raised ceiling area (now a walk-in attic) we caught one of the most amazing pieces of evidence we’ve ever seen.
This evidence has been seen and analyzed by Paul Bradford of “GHI”, Bill Murphey of “Fact or Faked”, Micah Hanks & Scotty Roberts the Founders of “Intrepid Magazine”, Founders of “Mufon”, Dr. Rita Louise, UFO expert Anthony Sanchez and others from around the Paranormal community.

An interesting list of well-known investigators are listed as having reviewed the video. No mention as to what their conclusions were, but it’s an impressive list. (shout outs to my friend the famous Mr. Hanks)

The video shows an interesting dark shadow moving in an erratic manner in some dark attic. Nothing more, nothing less.

What is interesting to note is that from that corner of the attic, we can see that there is a light source emanating from the same direction as the shadow. Meaning that this could be a person’s (paranormal investigator’s) shadow being casted as they move around in front of this light source.

What do you think?

Newton's Belief in Spirits May Have Led To The Theory of Gravity - Daily Grail

For those who would like to see irrationalism and magical thinking stamped out (*cough* Dawkins *cough*), here's a prime example of how silly black/white us vs them thinking is: Isaac Newton's theory of gravity may have arisen from his interest in the spirit world

[Newton'] belief in spirits and what the alchemists called active principles almost certainly allowed him to conceive gravity in the mathematical form that we still use today.

In Newton's time, the natural philosophers had turned their backs on astrology and with it, the idea that influences could simply leap across empty space. Instead impulses had to be transmitted through things touching one another. So, if there was a force coming from the Sun that moved the planets, then it had to do so through a medium.

Perhaps it was a fluid, driven to circulate by the rotation of the sun, which carried the planets around. This was the thinking of French philosopher René Descartes.

Yet Newton could not make the mechanical solution of Descartes work. The vortices simply could not reproduce the changes in speed of the planets as they approached the sun.

Alchemy offered a way out by having as a philosophical underpinning that non-material influences – spirits – existed. These needed no physical contact and could induce transformations or movement through the triggering of "active principles" within an object.

Primed to believe in these ideas, Newton discovered a simple, elegant mathematical equation that described the behaviour of gravity without the need for an intervening fluid. Gravity apparently worked across empty space. He called this principle "action at a distance" and instead of "spirit" began using the word "force" to better reflect its mathematical character.

His equation also reveals the "active principle" that governs an object's response to gravity. It is mass. With such direct analogies to spirits and active principles, Newton must surely have felt some sort of vindication for his alchemical beliefs.

The theory of gravity was so successful that it became one of the triggers for the Age of Enlightenment. Although hardly anyone now believes in the concept of alchemy, we do still believe that gravity can exert an influence across empty space. Engineers still use Newton's maths to launch satellites and send spacecraft to distant planets.

So was Sir Isaac a scientist or a sorcerer? In truth, he was a bit of both. And that was why he could succeed where others had failed.

I find it rather amusing that Richard Dawkins is a fan of the poetry of W.B. Yeats, considering the latter's inspiration in mysticism and occultism. Dawkins famously brushed that complication aside by saying "oh Yeats wrote a lot of pretty words; whether they mean anything is another matter." That's not as easily done when it comes to Newton I'd imagine...

BBC: Was Newton a Scientist or a Sorcerer?